Is the art of a ‘bad’ person, an immoral person any less acceptable than others? Should that artist’s punishment be that the art is hidden away, destroyed or vetoed? Should our disgust do this? How is our response coloured?
These questions are currently being asked at Ditchling Museum of Art and Craft with their exhibition, Eric Gill: The Body where my friend works and that I'm hoping to get to soon. Gill was a renowned sculptor and may well have created the
typeface this is written in. He also abused his daughters. The person and the product, the artist and the
art; where does the former stop and the latter start? With the gift of a glyph,
a poem or a picture, thrown from the creator, cut free to go into the world.
Other art forms are harder. Who listens to Gary Glitter anymore? And I felt
personally betrayed by Rolf Harris, who I’d always seen as an avuncular uncle figure.
With a performer it’s tougher to
separate. Their person is part of their art, we don’t want sexual predators
whispering into our ears through our headphones. Digging deeper, who knows their
ear piercer or their tattooist? I could be walking around with a murderer’s art
on my arm, etched into flesh for my life span. I didn’t think to ask for a
character reference.
Morals and
ethics vary but some things feel inherently wrong and bad. They repulse,
are reprehensible. This too is a line. I might be unkind, I might be a bully, I
might have done unforgiveable things. OR I could have a different moral
philosophy or ideology than you. To misquote The Big Bang Theory, ‘Some of my
best friends are Tories. Well, not my best friends, but I know them.’
Are you not going to read Jeeves
and Wooster? Can we disassociate? When work is out of the artist’s hands they
no longer own it. J K Rowling may now regret that she married Hermione and Ron
but she can’t undo it. That romance is owned by millions of other people. I buy
an abstract painting, that painting is mine. I look at this abstract and see flamingos
but the artist was inspired by the abattoir. However, I’m interpreting this story, and
there’s no irritating little explanation card by my painting.
The only thing that remains is
the name; the end credit. What is on Wikipedia for this font? Whose signature is
in the corner of the painting? Even the face, the body, the voice; that is the
work. And if you believe the work captures some of that cruel soul it is just
another story spinning from humanity which is and always has been wonderful and
terrible in more equal measures than we care to confess to.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for commenting, I'll get back to you soon